ArticleScientific reports2025
Reference genes selection and validation in yam by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification and validation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Corydalis saxicola under various abiotic stresses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Reference Gene Stability inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Stabilizing the Baseline: Reference Gene Evaluation in Three InvasiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression pattern analysis plays a crucial role in omics research, as it helps us understand the regulatory mechanisms of gene expression and the associated biological processes. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) is an efficient method for studying gene expression. Reliable q-PCR results depend on proper data normalization, which requires the use of stable reference genes. Yam, valued as both food and medicine, has significant commercial and economic potential. Its cultivation is being actively promoted in the central and western regions of Inner Mongolia. However, studies have shown that no reference gene is universally stable under all conditions. Therefore, screening and validating suitable reference genes are essential for accurately studying gene expression patterns in yam. This study evaluated nine potential reference genes based on transcriptome data of Chinese yam (Dioscorea opposita Thunb.), under various conditions, including yam tuber development, different tissues, High temperature, Low temperature, salt stress (NaCl), drought stress (PEG), abscisic acid stress (ABA), and methyl jasmonate treatment (MeJA). Using geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and RefFinder, we ranked these nine reference genes according to their expression stability. The results revealed that EIF was not suitable as a reference gene. Conversely, UBQ and PP2A were identified as the most stable and ideal reference genes for expression analysis across different conditions. Our findings provide a theoretical foundation for selecting reference genes in yam and will support more accurate gene expression studies within the genus Dioscorea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.