ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2025
Transitioning from native to synthetic receptors: broadening T-cell engineering and beyond.
Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering the next generation of cellular therapies for solid tumors: multi-specific armored CARs and TME reprogramming strategies.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Cellular senescence as a therapeutic target for aging intervention.Biomedical journal · 2026Review
- Targeting the pMHC-TCR Interaction: Molecular Strategies and Therapeutic Potential in Autoimmunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- In vivo CAR-T therapy: from molecular design to precision delivery.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Post-Translational Regulation of CD8Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Terminally exhausted CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- CAR-γδ T cells: a new paradigm of programmable innate immune sentinels and their systemic applications in cancer and beyond.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
T-cell immunotherapy has progressed rapidly, evolving from native T-cell receptor biology to the development of innovative synthetic receptors that extend therapeutic applications beyond cancer. This review explores engineering strategies, ranging from natural TCRs to synthetic receptors, that increase T-cell activation and therapeutic potential. We begin by highlighting the foundational role of native receptors in the T-cell response, emphasizing how these structural and functional insights inform the design of next-generation synthetic receptors. Comparisons between CAR and TCR-like synthetic receptors underscore their respective advantages in specificity, efficacy, and safety, as well as potential areas for further improvement. In addition, gene editing technologies such as CRISPR-Cas9 enable precise modifications to the T-cell genome, enhancing receptor performance and minimizing immunogenic risks. In addition to tumors, these engineered T cells can be directed against viral infections, autoimmune disorders, and other diseases. We also explore advanced strategies that engage multiple immune cell types to achieve synergistic, durable responses. By demonstrating how native and synthetic receptors collectively drive innovation, this review aims to inspire new research directions and ultimately expand the scope of T-cell engineering for universal therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.