ArticleScientific reports2025
Quantum-enhanced intelligent system for personalized adaptive radiotherapy dose estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research introduces a novel quantum-enhanced intelligent system tailored for personalized adaptive radiotherapy dose estimation. The system efficiently models radiation transport and predicts patient-specific dose distributions by integrating quantum algorithms, deep learning, and Monte Carlo simulations. Quantum-enhanced Monte Carlo simulations, employing algorithms such as Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) and Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE), achieve computational speedups of 8-15 times compared to classical methods while maintaining high accuracy. The deep learning architecture leverages convolutional and recurrent neural networks to capture complex anatomical and dosimetric patterns. Validation on simulated datasets demonstrates a 50-70% reduction in mean absolute error and 2-3% improvements in gamma index metrics compared to conventional approaches. Dose-volume histogram analysis further highlights enhanced Dice coefficients and reduced Hausdorff distances. These advancements underscore the potential for precise, efficient, and clinically relevant dose estimations, paving the way for improved outcomes in personalized adaptive radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.