Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481166›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Association between timing of surgery and refracture after initial osteoporotic fractures.

Zhujie Xu, Peng Wang, Yang Qiu, Yi Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhujie Xu *Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, 214023, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. jsxuzhujie@163.com.
Peng Wang *Department of Orthopedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, The Xuzhou School of Clinical Medicine of Nanjing Medical University, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Southeast University, Xuzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou, 221000, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yang QiuThe First Clinical Medical Colledge, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211166, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yi LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, 214023, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. lzttb@126.com.

Funding

General Program of Wuxi Medical Center of Nanjing Medical University WMCG202317Wuxi Funds for Science and Technology Development Y20222020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporotic refracture may result from multiple risk factors. However, few studies have explored the association between the interval from the initial fracture to surgery (i.e., the timing of surgery) and osteoporotic refracture. This study aims to investigate the significant risk factors of osteoporotic refracture and to provide more reliable interventions for its prevention. A total of 502 hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures from January 2017 to December 2022 at Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. This included 52 cases in the refracture group and 450 cases in the non-refracture group. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the refracture and non-refracture groups. These differences included age, height, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), hemoglobin concentration, total serum protein concentration, pain level, and the interval from fracture to surgery. Further binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression both indicated that the interval from fracture to surgery, pain level, and age were independent risk factors for refracture. According to the results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the prediction accuracy of interval time was high, with area under ROC (AUC) of 0.782, sensitivity of 63.5%, specificity of 84.4%, and threshold value of 10.5. Our study suggests that a longer interval from initial fracture to surgery is associated with an increased risk of refracture, with 10.5 days being the optimal threshold based on ROC analysis.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesTime-to-TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsROC CurveTime FactorsIntervalOsteoporosisRefractureRisk factorsTiming of surgery

Identifiers

PMID40481166
PMCPMC12144287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.