ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between timing of surgery and refracture after initial osteoporotic fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An orthogeriatric quality improvement initiative from the European Academy for Medicine of Ageing (EAMA): enhancing osteoporosis treatment and fall prevention.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Osteoporotic refracture may result from multiple risk factors. However, few studies have explored the association between the interval from the initial fracture to surgery (i.e., the timing of surgery) and osteoporotic refracture. This study aims to investigate the significant risk factors of osteoporotic refracture and to provide more reliable interventions for its prevention. A total of 502 hospitalized patients with osteoporotic fractures from January 2017 to December 2022 at Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Wuxi People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. This included 52 cases in the refracture group and 450 cases in the non-refracture group. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences between the refracture and non-refracture groups. These differences included age, height, body mass index (BMI), bone mineral density (BMD), hemoglobin concentration, total serum protein concentration, pain level, and the interval from fracture to surgery. Further binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression both indicated that the interval from fracture to surgery, pain level, and age were independent risk factors for refracture. According to the results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC), the prediction accuracy of interval time was high, with area under ROC (AUC) of 0.782, sensitivity of 63.5%, specificity of 84.4%, and threshold value of 10.5. Our study suggests that a longer interval from initial fracture to surgery is associated with an increased risk of refracture, with 10.5 days being the optimal threshold based on ROC analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.