ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting emergency department visits for non-traumatic dental-related conditions among Medicaid beneficiaries.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients who use the emergency department (ED) for non-traumatic dental-related conditions are likely to return for multiple visits, accounting for a disproportionate share of healthcare cost. Reliance on the ED for receiving dental care continues to rise, particularly among Medicaid beneficiaries. We sought to predict future "ED users" for non-traumatic dental-related conditions using machine learning algorithms and identify associated risk factors to help Medicaid outreach programs better target populations in most need of improvement in access to dental care. Among 6.4 million Medicaid beneficiaries aged 19-64 years, the state-specific ensemble prediction models demonstrated high performance across four states, with C-statistics ranging from 0.70 to 0.73, accuracy from 0.90 to 0.95, specificity from 0.93 to 0.97, and sensitivity from 0.17 to 0.23, consistently outperformingtraditional logistic regression models. Individual-level variables, such as age, race/ethnicity, and musculoskeletal complications, and area-level variables, such as racial/ethnic composition, indices of food access, and proportion of US-citizenship, explained a significant proportion of the variation in dental-related ED use. Using a machine learning-based risk model to monitor for risk factors of dental-related ED use can assist in developing more targeted care management interventions, addressing unmet dental care and social needs while reducing unnecessary dental-related ED visits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.