ArticleScientific reports2025
Estimation of mass loss under wear test of nanoclay-epoxy nanocomposite using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wear behaviour and statistical assessment of organomodified nanoclay reinforced glass fiber epoxy nanocomposites.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Application of Artificial Neural Networks and Factorial Design Analysis for Predicting the Interaction of Influencing Process Parameters in COACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, the wear behavior of nanoclay-epoxy nanocomposites is studied through Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) as predictive models. This study aims to measure mass loss under wear conditions by studying critical parameters like nanoclay wt%, load, speed, time, and water soaking time. Experimental runs are planned based on the Box-Behnken design of RSM to create a regression model, which is then validated by ANOVA analysis. An ANN model is also trained and tested to improve predictive accuracy, performing better than RSM. The results show that wear resistance is greatly enhanced by increasing nanoclay content, which minimizes material loss. Water absorption adversely affects wear performance, resulting in enhanced mass loss caused by plasticization and swelling. The ANN model is more accurate in prediction than RSM, with minimal variation from experimental data. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis gives insights into wear mechanisms. The research demonstrates the efficiency of combining statistical and machine-learning methods for optimizing wear-resistant polymer nanocomposites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.