ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning of automatic hierarchical multi-label classification method for identifying metal failure mechanisms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, a hierarchical multi-label classification method called HFFNet-2d is proposed for the automatic classification of scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of metal failure. The method combines the advantages of convolutional neural networks (CNN) and Vision Transformers (ViT) to effectively realize hierarchical feature extraction and classification of SEM images of fracture morphologies, enabling accurate identification of metal failure mechanisms at different scales. The dataset of high-quality SEM images in this work is sourced from reputable materials science publications for its comprehensive coverage of various failure modes and its suitability for training and validating the hierarchical multi-label classification model. The HFFNet-2d model can achieve a high accuracy of 97.71% in the first-level classification and 92.62% in the second-level sub-category identification. This performance surpasses the human experts on the same task. To ensure that the model predictions are sufficiently reliable, a multi-level gradcam algorithm is also introduced for checking the regions of interest of the Hierarchical model at two levels and the comparisons are made with human experts. It is anticipated that the optimization and extension of HFFNet-2d are conducive in diverse material systems and application scenarios to accelerate the intelligent process of material development and failure analysis, ultimately supporting the design of reliable and high-performance engineering materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.