ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel framework for neutron-gamma density logging: semi-empirical modeling, directional neutron sources, and experimental benchmarking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improved density estimation via pair production correction and experimental validation in neutron gamma logging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A New Pulsed Neutron-Gamma Density Logging Method Based on Gamma-Ray Spectra and Machine Learning.ACS omega · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neutron-gamma density (NGD) logging is a vital technique in subsurface exploration, enabling accurate determination of formation density and supporting hydrocarbon reservoir characterization. This study proposes a novel NGD logging method that utilizes a directional neutron source to enhance measurement precision while reducing the number of required detectors. A semi-empirical formula was developed to calculate formation density using directional neutron flux, and detailed simulations were conducted to evaluate the method's performance under varying neutron emission angles, mudcake thicknesses, and environmental conditions. To validate the simulation results, an experimental test was designed using a scaled well model with controlled porosity levels and a calibrated Am-Be neutron source. The experimental measurements were benchmarked against the simulation results, demonstrating strong alignment and confirming the accuracy of the proposed approach. The findings highlight the advantages of steep neutron angles in achieving superior measurement accuracy, with performance comparable to NGD-TC methods and improved over NGD-FC methods. This study underscores the reliability of the proposed method and provides a framework for further optimizing NGD tools for diverse subsurface conditions, advancing hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.