Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481135›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel framework for neutron-gamma density logging: semi-empirical modeling, directional neutron sources, and experimental benchmarking.

Abolfazl Rafizade, Seyed Abolfazl Hosseini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abolfazl RafizadeDepartment of Energy Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Zip Code: 8639-11365, Iran.
Seyed Abolfazl HosseiniDepartment of Energy Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Zip Code: 8639-11365, Iran. sahosseini@sharif.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutron-gamma density (NGD) logging is a vital technique in subsurface exploration, enabling accurate determination of formation density and supporting hydrocarbon reservoir characterization. This study proposes a novel NGD logging method that utilizes a directional neutron source to enhance measurement precision while reducing the number of required detectors. A semi-empirical formula was developed to calculate formation density using directional neutron flux, and detailed simulations were conducted to evaluate the method's performance under varying neutron emission angles, mudcake thicknesses, and environmental conditions. To validate the simulation results, an experimental test was designed using a scaled well model with controlled porosity levels and a calibrated Am-Be neutron source. The experimental measurements were benchmarked against the simulation results, demonstrating strong alignment and confirming the accuracy of the proposed approach. The findings highlight the advantages of steep neutron angles in achieving superior measurement accuracy, with performance comparable to NGD-TC methods and improved over NGD-FC methods. This study underscores the reliability of the proposed method and provides a framework for further optimizing NGD tools for diverse subsurface conditions, advancing hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir evaluation.

Indexed as

Experimental measurementsMCNP simulationNeutron emission anglesWell-logging

Identifiers

PMID40481135
PMCPMC12144213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.