Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481132›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Retrospective analysis of curative rectal cancer surgery outcomes in elderly patients.

Youssef Achour, Hamza Sekkat, Abdellah Moufid, Jihane El Hamzaoui, Samira El Fakir, Younes Bakali, Mouna Mhamdi Alaoui, Mohammed Raiss, Farid Sabbah, Abdelmalek Hrora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Youssef AchourDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco. youssef.achour@um5r.ac.ma.
Hamza SekkatDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Abdellah MoufidDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Jihane El HamzaouiDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Samira El FakirStatistics Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Fez, Morocco.
Younes BakaliDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Mouna Mhamdi AlaouiDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Mohammed RaissDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Farid SabbahDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.
Abdelmalek HroraDigestive Surgical Department C, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Rabat, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. Elderly patients, typically defined as those over 70 years, face a heightened risk of developing colorectal cancer as they age, and the proportion of elderly individuals affected by cancer will continue to increase. However, the current guidelines lack optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and there is a scarcity of clinical trial evidence of clinical trial evidence addressing rectal cancer in this group. Retrospective data was extracted from patients aged 18 and who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer. A total of 71 patients were included and divided into two groups: an elderly group (EG), comprising patients aged over 70, and a younger group (YG). Age, sex, ASA score, comorbidities, surgical treatments and post-operative morbidity and mortality were extracted from patients 'files. The study population included 55 patients (77.46%) in the YG, and 16 patients (22.54%) in the EG. The cohort consisted of 30 men (42.3%) and 41 women (57.7%), with an average age of 57.1 ± 14.6. Comorbidities were present in 37 patients (52.1%), and 53 patients (74.6%) presented advanced-stage rectal cancer. Of the total cohort, 9 patients underwent primary surgery, while 62patients (87.3%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Laparoscopic surgery was employed in 63 patients (86.6%), with 8 cases (12.69%) of conversion to open surgery. Thirty-seven patients (52.1%) required stomas, of which 11 (16.7%) were definitive. Postoperative morbidity was higher in the EG (50%) compared to the YG (21.81%) with severe complication rate at 12.5% and 7.27%, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rate was similar in both groups (EG = 12.5% vs YG = 3.6.). However, the post-operative mortality rate was significantly higher in the EG (2.81% vs 0%). Within 90 days postoperatively, 6 readmissions were recorded, with a severe morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo > 2) of 12.3% and a 90-day mortality of 4.2%. Curative surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients appears to present more difficulties to manage preoperatively, and presents more postoperative mortality, requiring a tailored approach that considers the specific clinical features and functional status of this population.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeColorectal surgeryElderlyOncologyOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID40481132
PMCPMC12144196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.