ArticleScientific reports2025
Retrospective analysis of curative rectal cancer surgery outcomes in elderly patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges in establishing ambulatory surgery in a Moroccan general surgery department.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Age and Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis Between Patients Younger and Older than 70 Years.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Preoperative social frailty and short-term postoperative outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a multicentre prospective cohort study in China.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. Elderly patients, typically defined as those over 70 years, face a heightened risk of developing colorectal cancer as they age, and the proportion of elderly individuals affected by cancer will continue to increase. However, the current guidelines lack optimal treatment recommendations for the elderly and there is a scarcity of clinical trial evidence of clinical trial evidence addressing rectal cancer in this group. Retrospective data was extracted from patients aged 18 and who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer. A total of 71 patients were included and divided into two groups: an elderly group (EG), comprising patients aged over 70, and a younger group (YG). Age, sex, ASA score, comorbidities, surgical treatments and post-operative morbidity and mortality were extracted from patients 'files. The study population included 55 patients (77.46%) in the YG, and 16 patients (22.54%) in the EG. The cohort consisted of 30 men (42.3%) and 41 women (57.7%), with an average age of 57.1 ± 14.6. Comorbidities were present in 37 patients (52.1%), and 53 patients (74.6%) presented advanced-stage rectal cancer. Of the total cohort, 9 patients underwent primary surgery, while 62patients (87.3%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Laparoscopic surgery was employed in 63 patients (86.6%), with 8 cases (12.69%) of conversion to open surgery. Thirty-seven patients (52.1%) required stomas, of which 11 (16.7%) were definitive. Postoperative morbidity was higher in the EG (50%) compared to the YG (21.81%) with severe complication rate at 12.5% and 7.27%, respectively. Anastomotic leakage rate was similar in both groups (EG = 12.5% vs YG = 3.6.). However, the post-operative mortality rate was significantly higher in the EG (2.81% vs 0%). Within 90 days postoperatively, 6 readmissions were recorded, with a severe morbidity rate (Clavien-Dindo > 2) of 12.3% and a 90-day mortality of 4.2%. Curative surgery for rectal cancer in elderly patients appears to present more difficulties to manage preoperatively, and presents more postoperative mortality, requiring a tailored approach that considers the specific clinical features and functional status of this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.