Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40481106›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Fluorescence-guided ureteral identification in robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis: a comparison of junior versus senior surgeons.

Linda A Alpuing Radilla, Qiannan Yang, Daniel Y Lovell, Tamisa Koythong, Brooke Thigpen, Luis E Delgadillo Chabolla, Qianqing Wang, Xiaoming Guan

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Indocyanine green for intraoperative ureteral identification in gynecologic surgery: A preliminary systematic review of feasibility, safety, and surgical outcomes.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linda A Alpuing Radilla *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Qiannan Yang *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel Y LovellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Tamisa KoythongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Brooke ThigpenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Luis E Delgadillo ChabollaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Qianqing WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, The Fourth Clinical College of Xinxiang Medical College, Xinxiang, 453000, Henan, China. Qianqing.Wang@xxmu.edu.cn.
Xiaoming GuanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. xiaoming@bcm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the ureters in patients with advanced endometriosis and severe pelvic adhesive disease can be challenging. Adhesiolysis along the deformed pelvic sidewall may increase the risk of prolonged operative time and incidental ureteral injury. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and surgical outcomes of using Indocyanine Green (ICG) under near-infrared fluorescence for intraoperative ureteral localization and preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) for advanced endometriosis, comparing procedures performed by two junior surgeons to those performed by one senior surgeon. This was a retrospective observational case series conducted by three minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons (X.G., T.K., B.T.) at a single tertiary care center between August 2021 and January 2025. A total of 92 patients underwent RALS using ICG fluorescence; 44 surgeries were performed by two junior surgeons, and 48 by a senior surgeon. The senior group had a higher percentage of patients with complete cul-de-sac obliteration (56.3% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.001). Our primary surgical outcome, total operative time, was 233 min in the junior group and 348 min in the senior group, initially showing a significant difference. However, after adjusting for factors such as history of prior abdominal surgery, cul-de-sac obliteration, and additional procedures (resection of ovarian remnant, bowel shaving, oophorectomy, enterolysis) using multivariable linear regression analysis, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Other perioperative outcomes-including patient characteristics, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain at weeks 1, 2, and 3-were comparable between the groups. Complication rates did not differ significantly. Notably, there were no cases of temporary or permanent ureteral injury in either group. These findings suggest that with ICG-assisted ureteral mapping, junior surgeons can achieve comparable surgical outcomes to senior surgeons. ICG facilitates intraoperative ureter identification, with the potential to enhance surgical safety by improving surgical precision and supporting the training of junior surgeons in managing complex endometriosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterAdultFemaleFluorescenceHumansIndocyanine GreenLaparoscopyMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesSurgeonsTreatment OutcomeIndocyanine GreenAdvanced-stage endometriosisFluorescenceRobot-assisted laparoscopic surgeryUreteral identification

Identifiers

PMID40481106
PMCPMC12144151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.