ArticleScientific reports2025
Biomechanics characterization of an implantable ultrathin intracortical electrode through finite element method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A multi-region flexible neural interface for behavioral state decoding in freely moving mice.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural electrodes are widely used in brain-computer interfaces and neuroprosthesis for the treatment of various neurological disorders. However, as components that come into direct contact with neural tissue, implanted neural electrodes could cause mechanical damage during surgical insertions or while inside the brain. Thus, accurately and timely assessing this damage was vital for chronic implantation, which posed a significant challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical effects and clinical application risks of a polyimide-based ultrathin flexible intracortical microelectrode through the finite element method (FEM). It analyzed the electrode-brain biomechanical effects during the electrode's insertion process and under steady-state acceleration with the electrode inside the brain. Furthermore, the study examined the impact of factors including implantation depth (ranging from 5 to 5000 μm), cortical thickness (0.5 mm, 2.5 mm, and 4.5 mm), step displacement (from 1 to 5 μm) during insertion, and acceleration direction (vertical and horizontal) on the electrode's biomechanical effects. The primary findings showed that the 98th percentile Von Mises Strain (ε
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.