ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of machine learning models for gait-based classification of incomplete spinal cord injuries and cauda equina syndrome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of Diagnosis and Prognosis in Spinal Cord Injury Using Machine Learning.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2025Review
- Objective assessment of gait and posture symptoms in Parkinson's disease using wearable sensors and machine learning.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Incomplete tetraplegia, incomplete paraplegia, and cauda equina syndrome are major neurological disorders that significantly reduce patients' quality of life, primarily due to impaired motor function and gait instability. Although conventional neurological assessments and imaging techniques are widely used for diagnosis, they are limited by temporal constraints and physical accessibility. This study explores the integration of machine learning and 3D motion capture gait data for effective classification of these conditions. Gait data from 214 patients were analyzed, and key features were identified using recursive feature elimination. Machine learning models, including support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost, were trained and validated. The XGBoost model achieved the highest accuracy (74.42%) and F1-score (74.27%), with age, cadence, and double support emerging as the most influential features. Sex-based differences revealed that males exhibited greater dynamic gait variables, while females showed higher stability-oriented metrics. Age-based analysis indicated significant gait changes after 60 years, highlighting the role of stability-related features. These findings demonstrate the potential of integrating 3D motion capture and machine learning as a scalable, noninvasive diagnostic tool. By detecting subtle gait variations, this approach can aid in early diagnosis and personalized treatment planning for individuals with neurological impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.