Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40480983›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2025

Optimizing wrist-worn wearable compliance with insights from two Parkinson's disease cohort studies.

Marjan J Meinders, Laura Heathers, King Chung Ho, Laura Russell, Chris Li, Bastiaan R Bloem, William J Marks, Ritu Kapur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Light force-powered cellular medical micromachines.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marjan J MeindersRadboud university medical center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. marjan.meinders@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6491-7035
Laura HeathersIndiana University School of Medicine, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indianapolis, Indiana, IN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1097-2678
King Chung HoVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8689-2318
Laura RussellVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6835-1093
Chris LiVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-6904-1763
Bastiaan R BloemRadboud university medical center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Neurology, Center of Expertise for Parkinson and Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6371-3337
William J MarksStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-2480
Ritu KapurVerily Life Sciences, South San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable technologies enable real-time, continuous, noninvasive data collection, where long-term compliance is essential. The Personalized Parkinson Project (PPP) and the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) utilized the Verily Study Watch. Participants, including people diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (PD), prodromal PD, and healthy controls, were instructed to wear the watch for up to 23 h daily without data displaying or reporting data back to the participant. Compliance measures and user experiences were evaluated. A centralized support model identified barriers to data collection and enabled proactive outreach. Median daily wear time was 21.9 h for PPP and 21.1-22.2 h per day for PPMI over 2 years. Participants were highly motivated contributing to PD research. These results highlight strategies for achieving strong engagement without providing individual data. This approach offers valuable insights for study designs where returning data to participants could introduce bias or affect the data integrity.

Identifiers

PMID40480983
PMCPMC12144100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.