Observational studyClinical lung cancer2025
Mortality in a Diverse, Real-World Lung Cancer Screening Cohort.
Observational study in Clinical lung cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer screening (LCS) is indicated exclusively for older individuals with substantial tobacco use, a risk factor not only for lung cancer but also for other malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Because LCS trial populations are commonly regarded as healthier than the broader LCS-eligible population, the real-world mortality rate among individuals undergoing LCS represents a key consideration in LCS implementation.
methodsWe performed a retrospective, observational cohort study of individuals for whom LCS was ordered between March 2017 and December 2022 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. Demographic characteristics and Charlson comorbidity index were obtained from the medical record. Dates and causes of death were captured from the medical record and National Death Index. We compared mortality according to patient characteristics using Cox proportional hazard ratios.
resultsA total of 1598 patients (mean age 62 years, 43% female, 45% Black, 18% Hispanic) were included in the analysis, of whom 60% had moderate and 20% severe comorbidity; 91% of patients were current smokers. With a median follow-up of 31.3 months, 93 patients (6%) had died. For patients without a date of death, 55% had an encounter in the healthcare system within 3 months of data collection. Mortality was significantly associated with age (HR 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11; P = .01), but not with patient sex, race, comorbidity, smoking status, or LCS completion.
conclusionsDespite substantial comorbidity burden, short-term mortality is low in a diverse, real-world LCS population, suggesting potential for benefit from screening and early detection of lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.