ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2025
CAR-T cell therapy in older adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL: benefits and challenges.
Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life trajectories over 2 years in CAR-T therapy recipients.Blood neoplasia · 2026Trial
- Navigating Ethical Challenges in CAR-T Treatment.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2026Article
- Baseline immunonutritional status drives CAR T-cell efficacy, survival, and safety in R/R lymphoma: validation of a pre-lymphodepletion PNI threshold.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies in transplant-eligible and ineligible relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The implications of TMSB4X in TIM3 hypermethylation and CD8Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Tisagenlecleucel yields superior patient-reported health-related quality of life compared to autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphomas.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (r/r DLBCL) have poor prognosis with a high unmet need for efficacious treatment options. Most patients with r/r large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) are elderly, which adds to the complexity of choosing the appropriate and effective therapy in these patients. Recently approved therapies, such as CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy, have shown improvements in the outcomes of patients with r/r DLBCL. Several real-world studies also support the use of these newer therapies in elderly patients. However, given the frailty, variability in the risk factors in each elderly patient, and the increased susceptibility for adverse events, a comprehensive geriatric assessment and a multidisciplinary approach could be helpful in guiding the management and treatment choices for these vulnerable patients. Individualized care can aid in giving elderly patients with r/r LBCL the best possible outcome with their chosen treatment regimen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.