ArticleToxicology and applied pharmacology2025
In vitro and computational approaches to predict developmental toxicity: Integrating PBPK models with cell-based assays.
Article in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment and New Approach Methodologies: US FDA/Triangle CERSI Workshop Report.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Secondary Pharmacology Targets for Pediatric Developmental Safety Assessment of New Drugs: Clinical Pharmacology Considerations.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Advances in Cytotoxicity Testing: From In Vitro Assays to In Silico Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- In vitro and computational approaches to predict developmental toxicity: Integrating PBPK models with cell-based assays.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The field of chemical safety assessment is experiencing a transformative shift away from animal testing toward new approach methodologies (NAMs). While in vitro screening platforms for teratogenic potential have advanced significantly, their practical application in public health risk assessment has been limited by the lack of quantitative frameworks connecting in vitro results to human exposure levels. This study investigated whether prenatal developmental toxicity assays could quantitatively predict developmental toxicity thresholds for nine known reproductive toxicants (bisphenol A, caffeine, carbamazepine, carbaryl, deltamethrin, ethanol, nicotine, thalidomide, and toluene) and one non-teratogen (acetaminophen). We employed a three-tiered physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to translate in vitro concentrations from ReproTracker, Stemina DevTOX quickPredict™, and developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) battery assays into human equivalent doses (HEDs). These in vitro-derived HEDs were then compared against HEDs based on rodent developmental studies' lowest observed effect levels (LOAELs), as well as human clinical doses and exposure predictions. Our findings demonstrate that the integration of PBPK modeling with Reprotracker, Stemina DevTOX quickPredict™ and DNT assays advances the reduction of animal testing while enhancing human-relevant developmental toxicity assessment. Moving forward requires parallel improvements in our understanding of developmental toxicity mechanisms and computational methods that effectively translate in vitro results to human risk evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.