ReviewOsteoarthritis and cartilage2026
Mechanoepigenetics in musculoskeletal disease.
Review in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transformative biomechanics and mechanobiology breakthroughs shaping the future of health and medicine.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This review explores the intricate interplay between genetic variants, mechanical forces, and the epigenetic landscape (defined as 'mechanoepigenetics'), particularly in the context of musculoskeletal (MSK) diseases such as osteoarthritis. Whilst our understanding of Mendelian monogenic disease has progressed with exome sequencing and the generation of novel gene therapies, common complex diseases characterized by difficult-to-pinpoint non-coding genetic variants have posed significant challenges. The recent implementation of techniques such as ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, and chromatin capture (Hi-C) has been pivotal in understanding how enhancers, promoters, and repressors interact with target genes to control gene expression. However, the data they generate are only more recently being used to filter non-coding variants for regulatory impacts. Even more pressing is that the epigenome and long-range interactions can be modified by environmental factors such as mechanical forces, and this is poorly understood, especially with respect to impacts on variant function. Here, we highlight the role of the dynamic mechanical environment in the regulation of the epigenome to identify mechanically mediated regulatory region interactions to streamline the identification of variant activity and how they might be impacted. We also explore the potential for targeting mechanically responsive loci with epigenome-modifying drugs. By integrating genetic, epigenetic, and mechanical insights, this review aims to advance understanding of disease mechanisms and propel the development of novel therapeutic strategies for MSK diseases, drawing parallels with emerging approaches in other fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.