ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage2025
Ultra-processed food consumption is associated with knee osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The gut-joint axis in osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Gut and Joint Microbiome and Dysbiosis: A New Perspective on the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Osteoarthritis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the relationship between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and knee osteoarthritis (KOA)-related imaging and clinical outcomes in men and women.
designOsteoarthritis Initiative participants with sufficient dietary and sociodemographic data (n = 4403) were included in this cross-sectional study. UPF was assessed by food frequency questionnaire-based NOVA Classification, categorizing diet according to processing level, with NOVA-4 indicating UPF. The exposure variable was standardized UPF proportion/day (%)-the proportion of NOVA-4 servings in the daily diet. The outcomes were Western Ontario and McMaster University OA Index (WOMAC) pain, activities of daily living (ADL), stiffness, total scores, average cartilage thickness (quantified using 3D-dual echo steady-state sequences on 3T MRI), Chair Stand Test (CST) and gait speed. Mixed effects and linear regression models were used for knee-level and participant-level outcomes, respectively. Models were adjusted for age, race, BMI, daily calories, physical activity, and medical insurance availability. Sex differences were tested by interactions between UPF and sex.
resultsSex interactions were significant for WOMAC-pain, ADL, total, gait speed, cartilage thickness (p-interaction-range < 0.001-0.006). Greater UPF was associated with significantly worse pain (β = 0.17 [0.093, 0.242], p < 0.001), ADL (β = 0.59 [0.365, 0.832], p < 0.001), total scores (β = 0.81 [0.483, 1.13], p < 0.001), thinner cartilage (β = -0.013 [-0.02, -0.006], p < 0.001), slower gait (β = -0.035 [-0.042, -0.027], p < 0.001) in women. Sex interactions were non-significant for CST and WOMAC-stiffness (p-interaction = 0.319, 0.573, respectively). With greater UPF, CST and WOMAC-stiffness showed significant poor outcomes (β = -0.008 [-0.013, -0.004], p < 0.001, β = 0.04 [0.008, 0.064], p = 0.011, respectively). WOMAC-stiffness results were not significant after Bonferroni corrections.
conclusionsUPF-rich diet is linked to worse KOA outcomes disproportionately more in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.