ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025
Efficient Multistate Free-Energy Calculations with QM/MM Accuracy Using Replica-Exchange Enveloping Distribution Sampling.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiscale Neural Network Potential with Anisotropic Message Passing for the Fast and Accurate Simulation of Protein Dynamics and Enzymatic Reactions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Boosting Computational Catalysis and Chemical Reactivity with Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Review
- Quantum Chemistry in Drug Design: Applications, Challenges, and the Need for Speed.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calculating free-energy differences using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is an important task in computational chemistry. In practice, the accuracy of the results is limited by model approximations and insufficient phase-space sampling due to limited computational resources. In the present work, we address these challenges by integrating the quantum-mechanical/molecular-mechanical (QM/MM) scheme with replica-exchange enveloping distribution sampling (RE-EDS) to obtain a multistate and multiscale free-energy method with high computational efficiency. The performance of QM/MM RE-EDS is showcased by calculating hydration free energies for three data sets using semiempirical methods for the QM zone. We highlight the importance of the choice of QM Hamiltonian and the effect of the compatibility between the QM and MM models. Especially the choice of semiempirical method has a substantial effect on the accuracy compared to experiment, but also the choice of MM water model is non-negligible. Our findings indicate that RE-EDS is an efficient approach for calculating free-energy differences with a QM/MM scheme, and lays the foundation for future developments and applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.