Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479517›Full record

ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2025

Preparing Medical Students and Physicians to Cope With Their Medical Errors: A Scoping Review.

Julia Harrison, Chee Yan Ting, Michelle Leech, Elizabeth Molloy, Margaret Bearman

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany clinicians will experience feeling responsible for inadvertently harming a patient through medical error. These situations can be distressing, difficult to navigate, and career altering. In addition to aftermath support, there is a recognized need for preemptive education to better prepare clinicians to cope after such events. Little published guidance exists about how best to do this. This scoping review explores the current knowledge about educational programs and strategies to prepare medical students and physicians to cope effectively with their own medical errors.

methodThree online databases, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus, were searched on January 3, 2025, for articles published from database inception to the search date that described programs designed to prepare medical students and/or physicians to cope better with personal involvement in patient harm from medical error. Eligibility screening and data recording were independently performed by 2 reviewers. Simple data were summarized, and common pedagogical strategies were identified by inductive thematic analysis.

resultsThe search yielded 5,359 unique articles for screening, of which 97 full-text articles were retrieved. Twelve articles met the eligibility criteria. The study interventions varied in structure and delivery methods but shared similar rationale, key messages, and pedagogical strategies. Dominant pedagogical strategies were divided into 2 groups: (1) what students need to learn about coping after medical error (attend to emotions, universality of fallibility, helpful and unhelpful paths for coping, workplace culture, care for colleagues, transfer of learning to the workplace) and (2) ways to support students in this learning (actual cases, psychological safety and honest conversation, role-modeling, reflection and learning from others' experience).

conclusionsA constellation of pedagogical strategies synthesized from the literature provides program design ideas for education that targets the development of learners' capacity to cope with involvement in patient harm from medical error.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMedical ErrorsPhysiciansStudents, MedicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID40479517
PMCPMC13007906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.