ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022
[Community-based care structures to promote nutritional health in the first 1000 days-Analysis of the status quo].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Nutrition in the first 1000 days of life is a relevant influencing factor for healthy (weight) development of children. Community- and population-based preventive approaches seem to be the most promising way in counteracting overweight (in childhood) and noncommunicable diseases. The aim of this study was to analyze the health care situation in terms of promoting nutritional health in the first 1000 days. Methods: Based on an internet-based search of possible community-based practice projects, standardized, guideline-based interviews with experts from science and practice were conducted. The focus was on the general assessment of the health care situation or a possible need for action, as well as concrete recommendations, with special consideration of vulnerable groups. In all, 14 of 40 persons selected in a snowball procedure took part. Results: All experts rated the current health care situation in terms of nutrition as insufficient. They were critical of the lack of a structural and political framework, in particular the frequent time limits of a program. As a result, measures to promote nutritional health or comparable interventions could not be successfully established. Therefore, clearer support by political and other relevant stakeholders, e.g., health insurances, and networking with or embedding of this topic area in public health services was demanded. Conclusion: From the experts' point of view, our results confirm that the promotion of nutritional health in the first 1000 days is meaningful and important. However, there is a clear need to optimize care structures and the concrete, sustainable implementation of primary prevention services as well as low-threshold access for pregnant women and families in precarious living situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.