Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479469›Full record

ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022

[Community-based care structures to promote nutritional health in the first 1000 days-Analysis of the status quo].

Lena Schrameyer, Linda Wittler, Lisa Schmidt, Stefanie Wessely, Maria Flothkoetter, Stefanie Eiser, Katharina Reiss, Mechthild Paul, Nina Ferrari, Christine Joisten

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lena SchrameyerInstitut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaften, Abteilung für Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0001-6725-8274
Linda WittlerInstitut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaften, Abteilung für Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Deutschland.
Lisa SchmidtInstitut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaften, Abteilung für Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Deutschland.
Stefanie WesselyInstitut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaften, Abteilung für Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Deutschland.
Maria FlothkoetterNetzwerk Gesund ins Leben, Bundeszentrum für Ernährung (BZfE) in der Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE), Bonn, Deutschland.
Stefanie EiserNetzwerk Gesund ins Leben, Bundeszentrum für Ernährung (BZfE) in der Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE), Bonn, Deutschland.
Katharina ReissNetzwerk Gesund ins Leben, Bundeszentrum für Ernährung (BZfE) in der Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (BLE), Bonn, Deutschland.
Mechthild PaulNationales Zentrum Frühe Hilfen, Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, Köln, Deutschland.
Nina FerrariInstitut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaften, Abteilung für Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Deutschland.
Christine JoistenInstitut für Bewegungs- und Neurowissenschaften, Abteilung für Bewegungs- und Gesundheitsförderung, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933 Köln, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Nutrition in the first 1000 days of life is a relevant influencing factor for healthy (weight) development of children. Community- and population-based preventive approaches seem to be the most promising way in counteracting overweight (in childhood) and noncommunicable diseases. The aim of this study was to analyze the health care situation in terms of promoting nutritional health in the first 1000 days. Methods: Based on an internet-based search of possible community-based practice projects, standardized, guideline-based interviews with experts from science and practice were conducted. The focus was on the general assessment of the health care situation or a possible need for action, as well as concrete recommendations, with special consideration of vulnerable groups. In all, 14 of 40 persons selected in a snowball procedure took part. Results: All experts rated the current health care situation in terms of nutrition as insufficient. They were critical of the lack of a structural and political framework, in particular the frequent time limits of a program. As a result, measures to promote nutritional health or comparable interventions could not be successfully established. Therefore, clearer support by political and other relevant stakeholders, e.g., health insurances, and networking with or embedding of this topic area in public health services was demanded. Conclusion: From the experts' point of view, our results confirm that the promotion of nutritional health in the first 1000 days is meaningful and important. However, there is a clear need to optimize care structures and the concrete, sustainable implementation of primary prevention services as well as low-threshold access for pregnant women and families in precarious living situations.

Indexed as

Community based preventionEarly ChildhoodHealth promotionIndividual preventionNutritional health

Identifiers

PMID40479469
PMCPMC9707151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.