ArticleJournal of the knowledge economy2022
Academic Research and Institutional Breakthrough: Theoretical Analysis Under COVID-19.
Article in Journal of the knowledge economy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After the outbreak of Covid-19, the public criticized China's imperfect system and unclear rights and responsibilities of governments at all levels. This study first analyzes the institutional impaction as plausible reasons for the viral outburst and social damage through three dimensions: the tightly coupled system and the decoupling between powers and responsibilities, the conflict between regulatory legitimacy and cognitive legitimacy, and the absence of nongovernment organizations (NGOs) and the nonprofessionalism of professional organizations. Then, given the informational asymmetry, we focus on the promising potential of academic research for an institutional breakthrough. Sensibly, professional knowledge and information disclosure played mediating roles between the relationship of academic research and government policy, while complexity of the decision and external and internal supervisions are motivators and constraints. On this basis, suggestions for achieving institutional breakthrough through academic research are put forward. This study enriches disciplinary boundaries by applying institutional theory to the discussion of state management and academic research, promoting scientific decision-making in political-academic cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.