ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022
[Student health promotion from the perspective of university students in Austria].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Student health promotion (SHP) is not yet widely applied but is considered highly relevant. To be of interest for the target group, SHP should meet their expectations and wishes. For this purpose, a nation-wide online survey was completed in June 2022. Materials and methods: More than 40 quantitative items and several open questions surveyed attitudes towards, use and impact of, determinants of participation, wishes, and needs regarding SHP. The items were assessed using a Likert scale (5 categories) and were available in German and English. Results: Overall, 90.6% like the idea of SHP, but only 49.8% found an offer at their university. Furthermore, 56.7% wish for more offers, mainly regarding mental health (+ 70% and + 60% agreement). The same is true for nutrition and specific nutrition suggestions, exercise, ergonomics, and compensation exercise for prolonged sitting. Furthermore, 26.9% want more offers for prevention of substance abuse. About 60% wish for more offers regarding various networking opportunities. Many suggestions regarding setting design and specific offers were provided in the open comments. Conclusion: SHP is seen very positively and should be increased, mainly regarding mental health, nutrition, and exercise. A possibility might be to focus on information and competence development at the start of their studies and then complement it with further specifics later.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.