ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022
[Acceptance and use of digital interventions for distress prevention among students].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- We don't need more apps, we need connection: recommender systems as under-explored chance to promote students' mental health at universities.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Educational distress perceived by students represents a high risk for the development of mental illness. Consistent use of digital antistress apps can effectively address and therefore compensate for care deficits in the prevention of stress-induced mental illnesses. In addition, consequent use can reduce barriers to the use of existing offers. Against this background, the acceptance and conditions regarding use of digital antistress apps by students at Bielefeld University were examined. Based on the acceptance and the conditions of use, requirements for better implementation of digital interventions are identified. Methods: Semi-structured interviews and quantitative surveys were used to conduct the study among the same 15 students ( Results: Using the UTAUT 2, crucial conditions regarding acceptance, use, and attitude were identified. The attitudinal acceptance of students towards antistress apps is largely positive, though this is not associated with usage behavior. Furthermore, our research reveals a strong dependence on individual needs, which is dependent on the individual daily situations and aspects in which stress is experienced. Conclusion: Conditions on the existing elements and interventions in an app for stress reduction must be considered in software development so that its use is subjectively perceived as effective. The development of needs-oriented offers and introduction into the lifeworld of the users as well as accompanying measures for target group-specific sensitization can further increase the acceptance, positively influence use and work against stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.