Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479406›Full record

ArticlePostdigital science and education2022

Materials and Places for Learning: Experiences of Doctoral Students in and around University Spaces.

Lucila Carvalho, Cristina Garduño Freeman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postdigital science and education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Postdigital Resonance.Postdigital science and education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucila CarvalhoEquity Through Education Research Centre, Institute of Education, College of Humanities & Social Sciences, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6528-1948
Cristina Garduño FreemanSchool of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People are more likely to thrive when they feel connected, when they feel they belong to a group, to a place, or when they feel part of a community. Places can play a powerful role in shaping one's attachment to others and to institutions as part of the development of one's identity. People's experiences of places are linked to their sensorial impressions of material and digital elements, and to their perceptions of how multiple elements interconnect and impact lived experiences or imagined futures. This research investigates doctoral students' experiences of places for learning in and around a university in New Zealand. The analysis combines individual interviews and digital multimodal artefacts created by participants who were studying on campus or studying at distance and remotely located. By acknowledging the diversity of university spaces where learning activity may unfold - in classrooms, at libraries, in the canteen, in the corridors, via online learning management systems, social media and messaging, or in the many in-between spaces such as buses, cafes, or working from home - this paper discusses the connections between people, places, material, and digital artefacts, with a focus on the materiality of learning in and around university spaces. Using socio-material conceptual lenses, the article reveals how students navigate the postdigital university through the spaces they inhabit and the places they value, and how their attachment to materials, feelings of inclusion, and learning purpose interconnect to support their (emerging) professional identity.

Indexed as

BelongingDoctoral studentsLearning spacesSociomaterialityVisual methods

Identifiers

PMID40479406
PMCPMC9309592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.