Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479349›Full record

ArticleEmployee responsibilities and rights journal2022

A Qualitative Study to Explore the Employment Experiences and Perspectives of Women Living with Multiple Sclerosis in the UK.

Cathie Railton, Laura Jefferson, Jo Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Employee responsibilities and rights journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cathie RailtonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.ORCID 0000-0002-4146-4851
Laura JeffersonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.
Jo TaylorDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Employment is a key determinant of health, yet up to 80% of individuals with multiple sclerosis stop work within 15 years of diagnosis. The unpredictable nature of MS, both on a daily basis, and longer term means that maintaining employment can be difficult. Multiple sclerosis affects women disproportionately (> 60% of cases) and they often experience greater workplace challenges, yet few studies explore this. This study aimed to deepen understanding of the employment experiences and perspectives of women with multiple sclerosis to help inform future policy developments and care. A descriptive phenomenological approach was used involving thematic analysis from fourteen in-depth semi-structured interviews (data collected 2020). The inclusion criteria were adult women diagnosed with multiple sclerosis living in the UK who have current or previous experiences of employment. Seven themes were identified: Multiple sclerosis symptoms, workplace support, adjustments in the workplace, prioritisation of employment, making compromises, time and informal networks. These themes offer a descriptive account of the participant's experiences of work, how they experience their multiple sclerosis in relation to employment and some of the constraints and enablers to work. The findings highlight the importance of both individual and broader socio-environmental factors to successful employment outcomes. Tailored community support for these women, such as that provided by nurses, was considered central. There is a need for better collaboration at a policy level between government departments and for more research into women with chronic conditions, to further explore the relationship between different variables.

Indexed as

DisabilityEmploymentMultiple sclerosisQualitativeWomen

Identifiers

PMID40479349
PMCPMC9213101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.