ReviewPravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022
[Status quo of workplace health promotion in social firms. Potentials and challenges for the future].
Review in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social firms employ 30-50% people with disabilities on the general labour market according to §§ 215-218 SGB IX and are obliged to offer workplace health promotion (WHP) since 01 January 2018. Objectives: This article aims to provide an overview of the current state of research on WHP in social firms and to derive potentials for practice. Materials and methods: In an exploratory literature overview, previously available findings on the work and health situation of people with disabilities and supervisors from social firms as well as the implementation, challenges and needs for WHP are researched and summarized. Research gaps are identified and practical implications derived from the research findings. Results: This overview highlights that social firms provide a variety of resources for employees with disabilities to manage job demands on the primary labour market. Supervisors, on the other hand, perceive coping with social and economic demands in social firms as a job demand. Previous research indicates that the development of networks of small and medium-sized enterprises has the potential to promote inclusive WHP. Conclusion: This article elaborates the work and health situation of employees and leaders in social firms as well as the status quo of WHP measures in social firms. The empirical state of research illustrates the need for more research on the implementation and evaluation of WHP measures in social firms. In practice, there is also potential for improvement in addressing existing challenges to WHP in social firms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.