Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479321›Full record

ArticleTrends in psychology2022

COVID-19 Concern and Stress in Bangladesh: Perceived Social Support as a Predictor or Protector.

Muhammad Kamal Uddin, Muhammad Nurul Islam, Oli Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad Kamal UddinDepartment of Psychology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Muhammad Nurul IslamDepartment of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Oli AhmedDepartment of Psychology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8540-8037

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insidious coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has been a global public health concern affecting almost everyone physically and/or psychologically. The psychological consequences like concern about COVID-19 and increased perceived stress are primarily results of preventive measures like social distancing, lockdown, etc. The present study examined whether perceived social support predicts stress or lessens the effect between concern and stress during social distancing. More specifically, we tested whether (a) the greater social support is associated with lesser perceived stress, and (b) the greater an individual perceives social support, the weaker will be the concern-to-stress relationship (a prediction from buffering hypothesis). We utilized the data from the Bangladeshi respondents (

Indexed as

Buffering hypothesisCoronavirus concernCOVID-19Perceived stressSocial support

Identifiers

PMID40479321
PMCPMC8887659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.