Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479320›Full record

ArticleSecurity journal2022

Detection of price manipulation fraud through rational choice theory: evidence for the retail industry in Taiwan.

Chin Kuo, Seng-Su Tsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Security journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chin KuoGraduate Institute of Management, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43 Keelung Road Sec. 4, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1213-3700
Seng-Su TsangDepartment of Business Administration, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, No. 43 Keelung Road Sec. 4, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All enterprises, regardless of industry, are exposed to fraud risk. In the retail industry, the perpetrators of fraud manipulate the sales price of products instead of the quantity sold to avoid inventory discrepancies. Fraud examiners attempt to identify anomalous transactions using data analysis. This study analyzes the causes of fraudulent behavior, conceptualized based on the aspect of rational choice, and proposes an anomalous transaction detection model using variables identified as indicating fraud. A two-phase experiment analyzing a real-world data set from a retailer in Taiwan was designed to evaluate the performance of fraud variables. The findings demonstrate that these variables could slightly improve the results of the analysis and demonstrate that machine learning is applicable to fraud detection. In addition, this study contributes to rational choice theory to validate the applicability in fraud detection. Fraud examiners in the retail industry could reduce fraud losses by adopting the proposed approach, implemented using Weka software, to identify anomalies.

Indexed as

Cash register manipulation fraudFraud detectionOccupational fraudRational choice theoryRetail industry

Identifiers

PMID40479320
PMCPMC9630802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.