ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022
[Gender-sensitive prevention and health promotion for children: opportunities and challenges in practicability].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- What is the health status of girls and boys in the COVID-19 pandemic? Selected results of the KIDA study.Journal of health monitoring · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In prevention and health promotion, gender differences should be considered already in childhood. However, there is a lack of both theoretically well-founded concepts and, in particular, practical recommendations. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify what researchers and practitioners recommend to providers in the development of gender-sensitive preventive and health promotion programs for children. Materials and methods: A multistep qualitative approach was chosen to capture the experience and knowledge of experts from both science and practice. It consisted of an expert workshop ( Results: The resulting recommendations include the following: addressing gender and social circumstances; reflection of gender roles and lifestyles; participation and quality management; documentation of practice projects; diversity in professional teams; gender sensitivity in qualification measures; dialogues and networking. Conclusions: When implementing gender-sensitive prevention and health promotion for children, political, societal, and individual aspects should be considered. While the topic already receives attention and is implemented in practical work, there is a need for research, especially with regard to conceptual development and evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.