Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479259›Full record

ArticleStandort2022

[Accessibility potential as a growth impulse for medium-sized centers between cores of metropolitan regions].

T Ramms, J Wedemeier

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Standort, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T Rammsregecon Gesellschaft für regional-wirtschaftliche Forschung und Beratung mbH, Bahnhofstraße 12, 21255 Tostedt, Deutschland.
J WedemeierForschungsbereich "Räumliche Ökonomik", Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut (HWWI), Fahrenheitstr. 1, 28359 Bremen, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0003-0659-9926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of the sub-areas of metropolitan regions is heterogeneous. Although the core cities can count on further population growth, the intermediate centers in particular have to adapt to further changes in growth. The article describes the location of medium-sized centers between metropolitan regions and their importance as a driving force for demographic and economic growth. Accessibility potentials are calculated on the basis of locations in the northern German metropolitan regions of Hamburg, Nordwest (Bremen-Oldenburg), and Hanover-Braunschweig-Göttingen-Wolfsburg, in order to describe the relative centrality of medium-sized centers. Sometimes, the medium-sized centers are more central than the metropolitan regions themselves and contribute to the stabilization of regional development in the spaces. Three conclusions can be drawn from this observation: first, that concentration processes can occur within rural communities and towns; second, that there is a need for flexibility in the concept of central places; and third, that spatial planning in cooperation with regional policy plays an important role in strengthening these centers.

Indexed as

Accessibility potentialCentral place theoryMedium-sized centersRural suburban zoneSpatial planning

Identifiers

PMID40479259
PMCPMC9561322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.