ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022
[Learning to understand the patient: real world evidence from the patient journey].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has underscored the importance of real world data in everyday clinical practice and has highlighted some long-standing problems of our healthcare system such as gaps in primary data collection, hurdles in the evaluation of patient data, and complexity regarding the data exchange between different institutions. In addition, changes in physician-patient relationships such as transitions from a paternalistic to a partnership-based relationship model as well as increasing digitalization have shaped our modern understanding of healthcare, emphasizing the issue of patient autonomy and self-efficacy and highlighting the need for innovative, patient-centered approaches. Methods: Using the patient journey as a theoretical construct, we describe the collection of different types of real world data, their meaning and handling. Conclusion: Mapping the patient journey process combined with a widely used data standard can lead to the acquisition of primary data in the healthcare sector which can be used by all medical treatment institutions. This will lead to an exchange of valuable data between institutions and circuit the current problem of proprietary formats. Furthermore, the evaluation of patient-reported outcomes as a standard in the clinical routine could enhance patients' autonomy and optimize treatment. Thus, the overall treatment effectiveness and survival of patients can be improved by creating a common data language and using a holistic, human-centered care approach through integrating perspectives of patients and their loved ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.