Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479237›Full record

ArticleReview of economic design2022

Entitlements to continued life and the evaluation of population health.

Juan D Moreno-Ternero, Lars Peter Østerdal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Review of economic design, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A principled approach to non-discrimination in cost-effectiveness.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan D Moreno-TerneroDepartment of Economics, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7288-8596
Lars Peter ØsterdalDepartment of Economics, Copenhagen Business School, Porcelaenshaven 16A, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6451-388X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyze the implications of axioms formalizing entitlements to continued life for the evaluation of population health, when combined with basic structural axioms. A straightforward implication of our analysis is that if the scope of equal entitlements to continued life is not limited, concerns for morbidity are dismissed in the evaluation of population health. Nevertheless, with axioms formalizing a more limited scope of equal entitlement to continued life, we provide several characterization results of focal population health evaluation functions, ranging from

Indexed as

AxiomsEqual value of lifeMorbidityMortalityPopulation health

Identifiers

PMID40479237
PMCPMC9204685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.