ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022
[Evaluation of behavioural health promotion measures in social firms].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Status quo of workplace health promotion in social firms. Potentials and challenges for the future].Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social firms according to §§ 215-218 SGB IX offer employment to severely disabled people on the general labour market. Since 2018, social firms are obliged to offer workplace health promotion (WHP) measures. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate behavioural-related offers implemented as seminars for WHP for severely disabled employees and their supervisors in social firms. Materials and methods: Using a multimethod study design, from June to November 2021, 12 seminars for employees (3 seminar concepts, e.g. on self-care in everyday work) were evaluated by means of focus groups ( Results: The results indicated that the implemented WHP measures for employees were rated positively by the majority in terms of satisfaction, seminar length, comprehensibility and usefulness. Similarly, supervisors evaluated the seminar content, didactics, instructor as well as the contribution of other participants mostly positively. Conclusion: The study provided initial empirical findings on the evaluation of WHP measures in social firms. In particular, seminar content adapted to the setting of social firms had a positive influence on participants' satisfaction with health promotion measures. Overall, further studies are needed to develop and evaluate structural and behavioural-related WHP offers in social firms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.