Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479188›Full record

ArticlePostdigital science and education2022

Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making.

Petar Jandrić, Timothy W Luke, Sean Sturm, Peter McLaren, Liz Jackson, Alison MacKenzie, Marek Tesar, Georgina Tuari Stewart, Peter Roberts, Sandra Abegglen and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postdigital science and education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Imagining Education Futures: Researchers as Fiction Authors.Postdigital science and education · 2023
    Article
  2. Understanding Digital Inequality: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope.Postdigital science and education · 2023
    Article
  3. The Postdigital-Biodigital Revolution.Postdigital science and education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Petar JandrićZagreb University of Applied Sciences, Croatia, and University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6464-4142
Timothy W LukeVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA USA.
Sean SturmFaculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4011-7898
Peter McLarenChapman University, Orange, CA USA.
Liz JacksonThe Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5626-596X
Alison MacKenzieQueen's University, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7360-5639
Marek TesarFaculty of Education, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7771-2880
Georgina Tuari StewartAuckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8832-2415
Peter RobertsUniversity of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4408-5125
Sandra AbegglenUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-9394
Tom BurnsLondon Metropolitan University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1280-0104
Sandra SinfieldLondon Metropolitan University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-7623
Sarah HayesUniversity of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8633-0155
Jimmy JaldemarkDepartment of Education, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7140-8407
Michael A PetersBeijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Christine SinclairUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5469-0831
Andrew GibbonsSchool of Education, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0847-5639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper is a summary of philosophy, theory, and practice arising from collective writing experiments conducted between 2016 and 2022 in the community associated with the Editors' Collective and more than 20 scholarly journals. The main body of the paper summarises the community's insights into the many faces of collective writing. Appendix 1 presents the workflow of the article's development. Appendix 2 lists approximately 100 collectively written scholarly articles published between 2016 and 2022. Collective writing is a continuous struggle for meaning-making, and our research insights merely represent one milestone in this struggle. Collective writing can be designed in many different ways, and our workflow merely shows one possible design that we found useful. There are many more collectively written scholarly articles than we could gather, and our reading list merely offers sources that the co-authors could think of. While our research insights and our attempts at synthesis are inevitably incomplete, 'Collective Writing: The Continuous Struggle for Meaning-Making' is a tiny theoretical steppingstone and a useful overview of sources for those interested in theory and practice of collective writing.

Indexed as

Academic labourCollective writingCollegialityEducational philosophyEmancipationEthicsIndigenous identityIndigenous knowledgeIntegrityKnowledge socialismMethodologyOpennessPeer co-productionPeer reviewPositionalityPostdigitalPraxisPublic ownershipRelational epistemologyTrustWriting as data

Identifiers

PMID40479188
PMCPMC9284493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.