Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479104›Full record

ArticleHMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik2023

[From "digital divide" to "cyber divide"].

Mascha Kurpicz-Briki, Christoph Glauser, Loris Schmid

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mascha Kurpicz-BrikiApplied Machine Intelligence Research Group, Berner Fachhochschule, Biel/Bienne, Schweiz.ORCID 0000-0001-5539-6370
Christoph GlauserInstitut für angewandte Argumentenforschung, Genossenschaft IFAA, Bern, Schweiz.ORCID 0000-0003-2849-2302
Loris SchmidInstitut für angewandte Argumentenforschung, Genossenschaft IFAA, Bern, Schweiz.ORCID 0000-0003-2244-1109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swiss users search for cyber risks three times more often than users in the USA. Due to the pandemic, we suddenly lived in a largely digital society, and according to the ITU, 8.01 mio. active people in Switzerland use the countless opportunities offered by the Internet on a regular basis. It is hard to imagine life without the Internet. But what are the most important opportunities and risks that actually concern the Swiss and the US population? For example, how widespread are the dangers of the cyber world, such as hate speech, cyberbullying or cybergrooming? What channels are used to search for and to find information about such topics? Do we have a much too strong risk awareness (bias) towards the risky cyber topics in Switzerland compared to the USA? Do Swiss users focus too little on the numerous online opportunities of the digital world, while Americans take full advantage of this potential without any concerns? This is what the present study is investigating. Until about the year 2000, people were concerned about equal access to the Internet and identified a "

Indexed as

Cyber divideCyber opportunitiesCyber risksDigital divideDigital impactOnline searchRisk affinity Switzerland/USASearch behaviorUser behavior

Identifiers

PMID40479104
PMCPMC10170049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.