Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40479087›Full record

ArticlePostdigital science and education2023

Understanding Digital Inequality: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope.

Caroline Kuhn, Su-Ming Khoo, Laura Czerniewicz, Warren Lilley, Swati Bute, Aisling Crean, Sandra Abegglen, Tom Burns, Sandra Sinfield, Petar Jandrić and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Postdigital science and education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Postdigital Resonance.Postdigital science and education · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Caroline KuhnBath Spa University, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0393-6093
Su-Ming KhooNational University Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8346-3913
Laura CzerniewiczUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1239-7493
Warren LilleyUniversity of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0454-8984
Swati ButeJagran Lakecity University, Bhopal, India.
Aisling CreanUniversity of St., Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland, UK.
Sandra AbegglenUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1582-9394
Tom BurnsLondon Metropolitan University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1280-0104
Sandra SinfieldLondon Metropolitan University, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0484-7623
Petar JandrićZagreb University of Applied Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6464-4142
Jeremy KnoxUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3486-9487
Alison MacKenzieQueen's University, Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7360-5639

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic affected more than 1.5 billion students and youth, and the most vulnerable learners were hit hardest, making digital inequality in educational settings impossible to overlook. Given this reality, we, all educators, came together to find ways to understand and address some of these inequalities. As a product of this collaboration, we propose a methodological toolkit: a theoretical kaleidoscope to examine and critique the constitutive elements and dimensions of digital inequalities. We argue that such a tool is helpful when a critical attitude to examine 'the ideology of digitalism', its concomitant inequalities, and the huge losses it entails for human flourishing seems urgent. In the paper, we describe different theoretical approaches that can be used for the kaleidoscope. We give relevant examples of each theory. We argue that the postdigital does not mean that the digital is over, rather that it has mutated into new power structures that are less evident but no less insidious as they continue to govern socio-technical infrastructures, geopolitics, and markets. In this sense, it is vital to find tools that allow us to shed light on such invisible and pervasive power structures and the consequences in the daily lives of so many.

Indexed as

Collaborative writingDigital inequalitiesMethodologyPostdigitalTheoretical kaleidoscopeToolkit

Identifiers

PMID40479087
PMCPMC10034872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.