ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2023
[Coping with subjectively experienced coronavirus risks: perspectives of young, chronically ill adults].
Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Fear to Vaccination: Changing Needs of Congenital Heart Defect Patients and Relatives over the Course of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Return to work for people with chronic health conditions after medical or vocational rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Regional COVID-19 measures and effects on subjective well-being in Germany: observing trends over time with data from a large population survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- [Social pediatric care situation and needs during the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2022. What is needed now?]Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Young adults with chronic diseases are considered to be at increased risk due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19). Information is lacking regarding whether and how they try to protect themselves, what their perception of risk is, and how the lockdown is experienced, in particular in German-speaking areas. Objectives: The paper analyzes coronavirus protection behaviors of young chronically ill adults, their risk perceptions, and how lockdown was experienced. Material and Methods: Episodic interviews were conducted with Results: Few respondents believe their personal risk from coronavirus is low, so they consider protective measures such as vaccinations as secondary. However, most interviewees stringently adhere to coronavirus pandemic guidelines. They may either feel obliged to do so, e.g., to protect other vulnerable persons, or they perceive themselves as very susceptible to severe corona infections. Regardless of the experienced limitations during the lockdown, it is also associated with new options for many interviewees. Online teaching makes it easier for them to continue their studies/vocational training despite their chronic illness and to maintain contact with their friends. Conclusion: Subjective corona risk perceptions and protective behaviors of young chronically ill adults should be considered more in the care and support of these target groups. Hybrid teaching should be continued beyond the lockdown so that young adults can participate socially despite their chronic illness while being protected from coronavirus and other infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.