Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478913›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Identifying common trends and ecosystem states to inform Gulf of Alaska ecosystem-based fisheries management.

Bridget E Ferriss, Mary E Hunsicker, Eric J Ward, Michael A Litzow, Lauren Rogers, Matt Callahan, Wei Cheng, Seth L Danielson, Brie Drummond, Emily Fergusson and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bridget E FerrissResource Ecology and Fisheries Management Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6739-5313
Mary E HunsickerFish Ecology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Newport, Oregon, United States of America.
Eric J WardConservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Michael A LitzowShellfish Assessment Program, Resource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Kodiak, Alaska, United States of America.
Lauren RogersResource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Matt CallahanPacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Alaska Fish Information Network, Juneau, Alaska, United States of America.
Wei ChengPacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Seth L DanielsonCollege of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America.
Brie DrummondUnited States of America Fish and Wildlife Service, Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge, Homer, Alaska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1222-1746
Emily FergussonAuke Bay Laboratories Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Juneau, Alaska, United States of America.
Christine GabrieleGlacier Bay National Park and Preserve, Gustavus, Alaska, United States of America.
Kyle HebertAlaska Department of Fish and Game, Commercial Fisheries Division, Juneau, Alaska, United States of America.
Russell R HopcroftCollege of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America.
Jens NielsenResource Assessment and Conservation Engineering Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Kally SpalingerAlaska Department of Fish and Game, Commercial Fisheries Division, Kodiak, Alaska, United States of America.
William T StockhausenResource Ecology and Fisheries Management Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Wesley W StrasburgerAuke Bay Laboratories Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Juneau, Alaska, United States of America.
Shannon WhelanInstitute for Seabird Research and Conservation, Anchorage, Alaska, United States of America.

Funding

Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, & Ecosystem Studies under NOAA Cooperative Agreement NA20OAR4320271Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council 21120114National Science Foundation OCE1656070 AND 2322806North Pacific Research Board L37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecosystem-based fisheries management requires the successful integration of ecosystem information into the fisheries management process. In the Northeast Pacific Ocean, ecosystem data collection and accessibility have achieved successful milestones, yet application to the harvest specification process remains challenging. The synthesis, interpretation, and application of ecosystem information to groundfish fisheries management in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA) can be supported by the identification of common ecosystem trends and ecosystem states across a diverse set of indicators. In this study, we used Dynamic Factor Analysis (DFA) and hidden Markov models (HMM) to analyze 92 indicators in climate, lower-trophic, mid-trophic, and seabird models for the western and eastern GOA marine ecosystems. Time series ranged from 25 to 52 years in length, analyzed through 2022. The DFA identified common trends across indicators and groups of covarying indicators (e.g., biomass of zooplankton species), highlighting opportunities to streamline communication of these data to management. Non-stationarity analyses revealed past changes in relationships, and can provide early warnings in future annual updates if previously identified correlations change. The HMM identified two to three ecosystem states in each sub-model that largely aligned with previously observed long- and short-term shifts in ecosystem dynamics in the region (i.e., shifts starting in 1975, 1988, and 2014). Annually updating these analyses, within an existing framework of reporting ecosystem information to management bodies, can streamline communication and improve early warning of changes in ecosystem dynamics. These tools can provide ecosystem support to management decisions relative to groundfish productivity and resulting harvest specifications.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFisheriesAlaskaAnimalsBiomassFishesMarkov ChainsPacific Ocean

Identifiers

PMID40478913
PMCPMC12143537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.