Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478879›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Evolution of the real area of contact during laboratory earthquakes.

Baoning Wu, Sylvain Barbot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Baoning Wu *Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.ORCID 0000-0002-9609-4325
Sylvain Barbot *Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089.ORCID 0000-0003-4257-7409

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) EAR-1848192Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) 22105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empirical slip-rate- and state-dependent friction laws and linear fracture mechanics constitute popular approaches to explaining earthquakes. However, the physics underlying friction laws remain elusive and fracture mechanics does not specify fault strength at the various conditions relevant to crustal faulting. Here, we introduce a physical constitutive framework that augments the traditional approaches by incorporating the real area of contact as the state variable. The physical model explains the dynamics of slow and fast ruptures on transparent materials, as well as the amount of light transmitted across the interface during laboratory ruptures. The constitutive framework elucidates the origin of empirical friction laws, and the simulated ruptures can be described by linear elastic fracture mechanics. Continuous measurements of the physical state variable or its proxies during seismic cycles emerge as a novel tool for probing natural faults and advancing our understanding of the earthquake phenomenon.

Indexed as

earthquakefracture mechanicsfriction lawrate-and-state frictionrupture dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40478879
PMCPMC12167961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.