Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478864›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Comparison between self-reported and pedometer-measured physical activity in Vietnamese adolescents: A reliability and agreement study.

Tram T N Truong, Van-Anh N Huynh, Kien G To

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tram T N TruongFaculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1239-5384
Van-Anh N HuynhFaculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2746-2048
Kien G ToFaculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-5584

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To compare the level of physical activity (PA) measured by self-reported questionnaire and pedometer in 12-year-old Vietnamese adolescents. Data was collected from March to May 2023 in two phases among 510 sixth-grade students in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The first phase involved a pilot study, which recruited 35 students from a randomly selected class to evaluate the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) test-retest reliability. PA was measured twice, with seven-day intervals between assessments. The second phase was a cross-sectional study including 475 sixth-grade students to evaluate the agreement between PAQ-C scores and pedometer data. Participants wore a pedometer continuously for seven days and completed the PAQ-C at the end of the monitoring period. Sociodemographic and anthropometric data were collected. The sample of 35 students showed that PAQ-C demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.89) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.82). After one week, McNemar's test indicated no significant difference in activity levels between the baseline and second assessment. In the sample of 475 students, there was a substantial agreement between PAQ-C and pedometer in classifying physical activity levels (Cohen's κ = 0.688, p < 0.001), with a strong correlation between daily step counts and PAQ-C scores (rs = 0.855, p < 0.001). PAQ-C is a reliable, cost-effective tool for school-based PA monitoring in 12-year-old Vietnamese adolescents, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Identifiers

PMID40478864
PMCPMC12143546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.