Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478859›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Caregiving in rural areas: A qualitative study of challenges and resilience.

Hyojin Choi, Christine Vatovec, Maija Reblin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyojin ChoiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1373-9790
Christine VatovecCollege of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.
Maija ReblinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-465X

Funding

Buffum FoundationUVM Auxiliary Funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesInformal caregivers are critical to providing support to adults with functional limitations or disease in rural areas. There is a need to understand factors that impact rural caregiving to build equitable health services, yet there is a lack of research that weighs both strengths and challenges. Our goal is to examine these factors as identified by rural caregivers in qualitative interviews. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsA purposive sample of rural-dwelling caregivers (n = 18) was recruited from a state-wide registry in a predominantly rural state. Semi-structured interviews were conducted by phone and interview transcripts were qualitatively analyzed.

resultsWe identified areas of strengths and resilience among rural caregivers, including informal support from friends and neighbors, which often bridged gaps in formal services. Rural caregivers also identified barriers to service use, such as long distance, travel and a lack of awareness within the healthcare system. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These challenges increase caregivers' needs for tailored family centered care coordination and highlight the necessity of providing diverse care delivery options. Our findings highlight that community-based efforts and policy should address barriers and rural disadvantage, while also fostering and empowering the resilience of caregivers in their rural home environment.

Indexed as

CaregiversResilience, PsychologicalRural PopulationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID40478859
PMCPMC12143517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.