ArticlePloS one2025
SARS-COV-2 mutations in North Rift, Kenya.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genome characterization of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron in Cameroon.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rise of new SARS-CoV-2 mutations brought challenges and progress in the global fight against COVID-19. Mutations in spike and accessory genes affect transmission, vaccine efficacy, treatments, testing, and public health strategies. Monitoring emerging variants is crucial to halt re-emergency of the virus and spread. 44 nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs from Kenyan patients were sequenced with the Illumina platform. Galaxy's bioinformatic tools were used for genomic analysis. SARS-CoV-2 genome classification was done using PANGOLIN and mutation annotation with the COVID-19 Annotator tool. From this study, 5 clades of SARS-CoV-2 were identified of whom 38 (86%) were BA.1.1; 2 (5%) were BA.1.1.1; 1 (2%) was BA.1; 1 (2%) was BA.1.14 and 2 (5%) were AY.46. Symptomatic patients were 16 out of 18 males and 22 out of 26 females. Out of these, symptomatic patients, BA.1.1 was found in 14 males and 18 females. In these clades we found 53 significant mutations of which 42 were non-synonymous, 10 synonymous, 7 deletions, 4 insertions and 2 extragenic. Out of the 42 non-synonymous mutations, 7 were exclusively found in symptomatic patients. Two new mutations, S:R214R, and NSP2:A555A, were also found and were dominant in symptomatic patients. These findings add to the understanding of the SARS-CoV-2 virus future evolution in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.