ArticlePloS one2025
The TMA team and TTP pathway improved outcomes in a cohort with Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProviding optimal care for patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is challenging because of multiple involved specialties, knowledge gaps, and a high rate of disease relapse. A thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) Team and TTP Pathway could improve outcomes.
objectivesTo assess if a structured TTP Pathway, supported by a TMA Team, improved TTP care by reducing TTP relapse and TTP-related death (TTP-RRD) at a rural Appalachian medical center.
methodsProspective cohort quality improvement project using the DMAIC quality improvement framework (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) to develop a TMA Team and TTP Pathway. Pathway care included standardized use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), rituximab, caplacizumab, as well as improved coordination between medical services, and regular outpatient biochemical TTP surveillance. Outcomes were determined by retrospective chart review for patients with acute TTP treated with usual care (N = 16 episodes) and the TTP Pathway (N = 16 episodes). RESULTS AND
conclusionsAll patients had acquired TTP. TTP-RRD at 90 days was reduced from 69% with usual care to 6% with Pathway care (95% CI 0.35 to 0.90, P = 0.0004), a relative risk reduction of 91%; TTP relapse alone at 90 days was reduced from 62% to 0% (95% CI 0.36 to 0.88, P = 0.0002) with Pathway care. The number needed to treat to prevent TTP-RRD was 1.59 at 90 days. Over the project duration usual care demonstrated a hazard ratio for TTP-RRD of 12.58 compared to Pathway care. With the intervention, the duration of TPE was increased (median 6 vs 12 sessions, P < 0.05), as was use of rituximab (31.3% vs 93.8%, 95% CI -0.36 to -0.88, P = 0.003), and caplacizumab (6.3% vs 62.5%, 95% CI -0.027 to -0.81, P = 0.001). All Pathway patients underwent biochemical surveillance, and 31% had pre-emptive rituximab to reduce possibility of clinical relapse. A structured TTP Pathway significantly reduces morbidity and aligns care with modern clinical guidelines. The TMA Team is a valuable institutional resource to improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.