ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Cofactors of earlier uptake of modern postpartum family planning methods in Kenya.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are limited data on uptake of postpartum family planning (FP), particularly in high HIV prevalence settings. We assessed the timing of modern postpartum FP initiation and the cofactors of earlier uptake using longitudinal data from a clinical trial conducted in Kenya to assess two models of PrEP delivery among pregnant and postpartum women (NCT#03070600). Time to uptake of modern postpartum FP was estimated using survival analysis methods, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine cofactors of earlier uptake of modern postpartum FP. Among 4,191 women, median age was 24 years, 17% were aged 15-19 years, 88% were in a steady relationship, 50% intended to be pregnant and 75% were multigravida. The median time to resumption of sex was 8 weeks postpartum versus 24 weeks for uptake of postpartum FP. At 6 weeks postpartum, 42% of women had resumed sex, versus 12% who took up FP; at 14 weeks, 79% versus 38%; at 6 months, 88% versus 59%; and at 9 months, 91% versus 80%, respectively. Injectables and implants were the most common FP methods. Approximately 3.3% of all women became pregnant during the 9-month postpartum period. Being older and having ≤4children was associated with earlier uptake of modern postpartum FP. Women with lower education, primigravida, low social support, history of miscarriage/stillbirth, without a partner at enrolment, not residing with their partners, not receiving financial support from their partner and whose youngest child at enrolment was < 2years had later uptake of postpartum FP. Women who were ambivalent about their immediate previous pregnancy took up postpartum FP later than those who intended to be pregnant. Our findings underscore the importance of addressing the individual, interpersonal, social and obstetric factors associated with timeliness of postpartum FP uptake during the development and delivery of postpartum FP interventions, particularly in high HIV prevalence settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.