Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Simple, rapid, and efficient purification of M13 phages: The Faj-elek method.

Gizem Kılıç, Esma Aybakan, Neda Tatlıoğlu, Gökçen Özgün, Tanıl Kocagöz, Erkan Mozioğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gizem KılıçDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Esma AybakanDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4742-4914
Neda TatlıoğluDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Gökçen ÖzgünDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Tanıl KocagözDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Erkan MozioğluDepartment of Medical Biotechnology, Institute of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3027-5166

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

M13 bacteriophages (phages) are used as very important tools in molecular biology, biotechnology and, nanotechnology. Many methods have been developed so far for the purification of these phages. However, it is important that phages retain their infecting properties, especially in biotechnological applications such as phage display technology. The most widely used is the PEG precipitation method, but it has some limitations such as impurities and reduced infectivity. To overcome them, we developed a new method for purification of M13 bacteriophages using syringe filters made of cellulose acetate membranes with a pore diameter of 0.22 µm. Phages were aggregated so that they could remain on the filters and for this purpose, the pH of the phage cultures was reduced to 3. The phage cultures were filtered and then the phages were recovered in tris-buffered saline (TBS) buffer (pH 10.5) by reversing the filter. The recovery rate was 250% higher than the standard PEG method. This new Faj-elek method offers an alternative to existing methods, allowing cheaper, easier and faster purification of M13 phages using syringe filters available in every research laboratory.

Indexed as

Bacteriophage M13CelluloseFiltrationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationCellulose

Identifiers

PMID40478842
PMCPMC12143533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.