Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478831›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Examination of hyper-palatable foods and their nutrient characteristics using globally crowdsourced data.

Daiil Jun, Kelly Knowles, Tera L Fazzino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daiil JunDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5494-8417
Kelly KnowlesDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5546-6177
Tera L FazzinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2896-9791

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyper-palatable foods (HPF), characterized by specific nutrient combinations at moderate to high levels (e.g., fat and sodium), have been suggested to increase energy intake and obesity risk due to their strong reinforcing properties. The study examined patterns in HPF availability, nutrient characteristics, and overlap with ultra-processed foods (UPF) across countries from a globally crowdsourced, open-source dataset. Food data (N = 314229 food items) from 17 countries were analyzed. Compared to the US, foods from most European countries examined, as well as Canada and Mexico, were significantly less likely to be identified as HPF (ORs = 0.70 to 0.93) and had lower % of calories from fat, sugar, starchy carbohydrates, and sodium compared to HPF items from the US (ORs = 0.76 to 0.98). Across countries, items identified as HPF substantially exceeded HPF threshold criteria by 70-229%. Foods identified as being both HPF and ultra-processed foods ranged from 33% (Bulgaria) to 50% (US). Overall, findings from 17 countries across Europe, North America, and South America highlighted foods from the US as being more likely to be hyper-palatable relative to most other countries examined. Results highlighted variability in the degree to which foods met criteria as HFP and UPF across countries.

Indexed as

CrowdsourcingFast FoodsNutrientsNutritive ValueEnergy IntakeEuropeHumansObesityNutrients

Identifiers

PMID40478831
PMCPMC12143524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.