ArticlePloS one2025
First insight into oral health misinformation in Jordan; an analysis of web content and information-seeking behaviors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrating the internet into daily life has profoundly influenced the public's behavior of seeking health information. Free access to cyberspace created a fertile environment for the spread of oral health misinformation, which can have a detrimental impact on the public's oral health. The prevalence of oral health misinformation in Jordan has not been investigated; therefore, it is crucial to understand how oral health misinformation originates and what contributes to its dissemination.
objectivesThis study aims to examine the prevalence of oral health misinformation published on web pages in Jordan and to offer insight into the public's information-seeking behaviors regarding oral health.
methodsThis study is a mixed methods infodemiological analysis of oral health misinformation. A systematic content analysis was executed on web pages published in the Arabic language in Jordan from 2019 to 2023.
results704 web pages were retrieved, of which 320 relevant web pages were included in the content analysis. Among these, 193 web pages (60.3%) published oral health misinformation. Publishers without a professional background published 185 web pages (95.9%) of the total misinformation-expressing web pages. According to the dental field, the highest frequency of misinformation occurred in oral medicine-101 web pages (52.3%). The validity of published oral health information was significantly influenced by the publishers' interest (P = 0.006), the articles' main themes (P = 0.005), and the publishers' professional background (P < 0.001). Contextual analysis of oral health misinformation showed significant differences among dental fields (P = 0.019), with the most frequent occurences related to causes (18.8%), home remedies (15.7%), and treatment (15.5%). Geographical variations in interest in oral health searches were observed across Jordanian governorates (P < 0.001), and temporal trends in interest varied significantly across the five-year period(P = 0.019).
conclusionThe findings of this study suggest a need for public health interventions to restrict the dissemination of oral health misinformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.