Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478806›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Parental experience of the diagnostic process and its role in the decision to terminate pregnancy due to fetal abnormality; A qualitative interview study.

Maiken Fabricius Damm, Dorte Hvidtjoern, Puk Sandager, Ida Vogel, Christina Prinds, Stina Lou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maiken Fabricius DammDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Dorte HvidtjoernDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Puk SandagerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ida VogelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christina PrindsDepartment of Women's Health, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Stina LouDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-5780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe detection of fetal malformation is a shock to expectant parents and often initiates a diagnostic process of additional tests and ultrasound scans, that may be uncertain and stressful to the parents. The aim of the present study was to investigate how expectant parents experienced the diagnostic process and how their decision to terminate the pregnancy was reached during that process.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with 11 Danish women and nine male partners one to five months after termination of pregnancy. All interviews were conducted in the participants' homes and lasted 97-135 minutes. Thematic analysis was performed.

results1) The theme, 'In no man's land', describes the two-phased diagnostic process: First, the initial shock of a potential ultrasound finding, and the uncertain - but still hopeful - days of waiting for a follow-up scan and specialist consultation. Second, the feeling of professionalism and companionship when interacting with the fetal medicine specialists, who still could not always provide the hoped-for answers. 2) The theme, 'Inescapable decision', describes how decision-making oscillated as new information or potential interpretations entered the diagnostic process. The participants described a continuous contemplation of the inevitable final choice regarding continuation or termination. Being in this process - for days or weeks - was described as an emotional rollercoaster with feelings of both hope and despair until the final decision to terminate was made.

conclusionDuring a prenatal diagnostic process parents must endure uncertainty, waiting times and an ongoing oscillation between hope and no-hope for the pregnancy. However, the diagnostic process may also be understood as an opportunity for dialogue, reflection and adjustment, allowing for a personal and well-considered decision, even if painful.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedCongenital AbnormalitiesDecision MakingFetusParentsAdultDenmarkFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisQualitative ResearchUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID40478806
PMCPMC12143557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.