Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478755›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2025

The impact of pooling on the observed microbiome profile of preweaned piglet feces.

Tara N Gaire, Jared Young, Thomas Wehri, Mark Schwartz, Randall Singer, Maria Pieters, Noelle R Noyes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiota variation inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tara N GaireDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1805-8051
Jared YoungDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, United States.
Thomas WehriDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, United States.
Mark SchwartzDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, United States.
Randall SingerDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, United States.
Maria PietersDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, United States.
Noelle R NoyesDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, United States.

Funding

National Institute of Food and AgricultureUnited States Department of Agriculture 2021-68015-33499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pooling individual samples could be an efficient approach for large-scale population-based microbiome studies. However, it is unknown whether pooled samples accurately reflect the microbiome composition and diversity obtained from individual samples. This study investigated the impact of various pooling methods on the observed fecal microbiome of preweaned piglets. Individual fecal samples were collected from 10 litters of day-old piglets (N = 137) and 10 litters of 20-day-old piglets (N = 121), as well as pen-floor samples from the same litters. The individually collected samples were processed individually and also used to create pools of both raw feces and extracted DNA. Individual samples, raw feces pools, DNA pools, and pen-floor samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The microbial profile in pen-floor samples from litters of preweaned piglets was very different from individual piglet samples within the pen; thus, they may not be suitable for litter-level piglet microbiome studies. However, overall microbial diversity and composition from DNA and feces pools were comparable to individual samples, despite potentially underestimating some low-abundance or low-prevalence taxa. These results suggest that pooling can be used as an efficient and cost-effective approach to characterize litter-level microbial profiles for current and future population-level microbiome research in preweaned piglet populations.

Indexed as

BacteriaFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaSpecimen HandlingAnimalsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASwineDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA gene sequencingcomposite pen floorfecal microbiomepoolingswine

Identifiers

PMID40478755
PMCPMC12166543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.